Microservices vs. Serverless Architecture

Microservices vs. Serverless Architecture

The main themes in the area of cloud-native computing are microservices and Serverless. Although the architecture of microservices and Serverless frequently coincide, they are independent technologies and play a different role in modern software environments. At the same time, Serverless as well as microservice technologies, highly scalable solutions are built.

Let us understand what these technologies are and what should be used for the creation of your application?


The phrase ‘microservices’ refers to an architectural model where the applications are divided into several little services (hence the term ‘microservice’). The structures of microservices are the opposite of monoliths (meaning applications where all functionality runs as a single entity).

Imagine an app that allows users to look for things, put them in their carts, and finalize their purchases as a simplistic example of a microservice application. This app can be used as a series of independent microservices:

  • The application interface is at the front.
  • A search service that searches products in a user-generated search query database.
  • A product-detail service with additional information regarding products on which customers click.
  • A shopping cart service to track the goods in your cart.
  • A check-out service for the process of payment.

Microservices can also increase the reliability and speed of your program by extending the footprint of your application. If one microservice fails, you keep the remainder of your app operating, so your users are not locked out totally. Also, because microservices are smaller than complete applications, spinning out a new microservice is faster than re-loading the full application, replacing a failing instance (or adding capacity if your application load increases).

Let’s Gain Some Benefits of Microservices Architecture

Microservices are best suited for evolving, sophisticated, and highly scalable applications and systems. Microservices are a good solution, especially for applications with a wide range of data processing, because you may divide complex functions into several services for easy development and maintenance.

  • Add/Update Flexibility: You can implement or changing one feature at a time rather than update the complete application stack;
  • Resilience: as the application is separated, a partial stoppage or crash does not always affect the remainder of the application,
  • Developer Flexibility: microservices can be created in different languages, and each of them has its library,
  • Selective scalability: Only micro-services with high use can be extended instead of extending the whole application.

Microservice Framework Challenges

  • When divided into autonomous components, complexity increases
  • More overview to manage many databases, ensure data consistency and monitor each microservice continually
  • Four times more vulnerable to security breaches are Microservice APIs
  • The demand for know-how and computer resources can be costly
  • It can be too sluggish and complicated for smaller businesses to install and iterate fast
  • A distributed environment requires a tighter interface and higher test coverage.


Serverless is a model where application code is performed upon request to answer triggers that the application developer has specified in advance. Code running in this way can represent the entire program (called a Serverless function). However, Serverless functions are more commonly used for implementing discrete application function units.

Compared with typical cloud or server-centered infrastructure, the advantages of Serverless computing are many. The Serverless architecture enables many developers with more scalability, flexibility, and shorter release times at cheaper costs. Developers do not need to bother about buying, setting, and managing backend servers using Serverless architecture. Serverless computing, however, is not a panacea for all developers of web applications.

Let’s Gain Some Benefits of Serverless Architecture

  • Reduce the time and cost to construct, maintain and update the infrastructure
  • Reduce the cost of recruiting server and database specialists
  • Focus on producing high-quality, quicker deployment applications
  • Best suited for customized and projected to grow short-term and real-time processes.
  • Multiple subscription price models for efficient estimates
  • Rapid scalability has little impact on performance

Serverless Framework Challenges

  • Long-term contracts with the third-party manager.
  • Business logic or technological modifications can make a change to another provider with challenges.
  • Multi-tenant Serverless platforms can introduce performance problems or defects on a pooled platform if the nearby tenant uses defective code.
  • Inactive applications or services for an extended period may necessitate a cold start that requires additional time and effort to establish resources.

Microservices versus serverless: Which One Should Be Used for The Creation of Applications?

Of course, both microservices and Serverless architectures have advantages and limitations. Determining which architecture to use is necessary to analyze the business objectives and the extent of your firm.

Ultimately, if costs and a fast-marketing deployment are important, Serverless is a smart bet. But if your firm wants to create a huge, complicated application where the product is expected to develop and adapt, microservices are a more feasible solution.

It is also possible to mix these technologies in one cloud-native instance with the correct team and effort.

You should consider these considerations while making an informed selection on what to utilize — the degree of Serverless granularity affects tools and frames. The higher the granularity, the more complex integration testing becomes, the more difficult it will be to debug, resolve and test. In contrast, microservices are a mature method, and tools and processes are well supported.

To Sum up

Microservices and Serverless architecture follow the same fundamental ideas. However, they are opposed to typical monolithic approaches to development that prioritize scalability and flexibility.

Albeit, Companies must examine their product scope and priorities to pick between a Serverless architecture and microservices. If cost-effectiveness and a shorter market time are a goal, Serverless architecture is a choice.

Learn More: Cloud Services of Metaorange Digital 

Microservices vs Serverless Architecture| MetaOrange

A Guide to Serverless Architecture

Blog Date

8 August, 2022


Application Modernization

Related More Blogs